Part 1: Introduction, Overclocking & Test Platform
Part 2: Benchmarks
Part 3: Gaming & Power Consumption
Continued from Part 1...
Test Results
The slowest Core2Quad managed to hold a 7% lead over the fastest Phenom. But of course the latter is priced lower.
The same 7% lead was seen again in 3dsmax.
This time the same gap widens to 25% in POV-Ray.
Things turned around when it comes to AutoMKV encoding, the 9850 is actually slightly faster than the Q6600.
Not mentioning the 45nm Q9300, no Phenoms came even close to Q6600.
Even the dual-core Wolf looks threatening to the quad-core Phenoms.
DivX performance favors the Core architecture. Even the good old E6750 beats the fastest Phenom here.
No doubt, Intel quad cores are still in the lead.
Finally, the Phenom X4 9850 managed to catch up with the Q6600
Next Page
Part 1: Introduction, Overclocking & Test Platform
Part 2: Benchmarks
Part 3: Gaming & Power Consumption
29 March 2008
AMD B3 Phenom X4 9850 benchmarked Part2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 COMMENTS:
Post a Comment